overall
89
93
style

bottled
available

on tap
unknown

Broad Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 1066   WEIGHTED AVG: 3.56/5   EST. CALORIES: 255   ABV: 8.5%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Bottle: Unfiltered.

A tick is a star rating
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


  • Rate This
  • Statistics
  • Locate Sellers




2
GreenVersus (6) - Den Haag, NETHERLANDS - SEP 14, 2021 does not count
UPDATED: SEP 14, 2021 Note to self: stop buying this beer. Too much carbonation and that fucking banana is in there again.

2.3
Cool_Bond (5099) - KUNG_AV_OL @ Instagram, SWEDEN - AUG 29, 2021
UPDATED: AUG 29, 2021 Aroma and taste of the foam banana and maltiness. Easy bitterness that fills the upper part of the mouth for a short while. Okay beer. Follow me @ Kung av öl @ Facebook for more pictures and ratings.

3.1
llachapu (59) - SPAIN - AUG 11, 2021
UPDATED: AUG 11, 2021 Cerveza algo turbia. Aroma suave con notas dulces y afrutadas. Copa tipo tulipa.

3.2
Jingis (2362) - Bratislava, SLOVAKIA - AUG 9, 2021
UPDATED: AUG 9, 2021 Dávnejšie zdekustovana fľaška. Takže len pre čisto štatistické účely. Ak to niekomu vadí ma problém 😂

3.8
BBHansen (2416) - Køge, DENMARK - JUL 30, 2021
UPDATED: JUL 30, 2021 Bottle @ Friends/Dr. yeast. Appearance: pours slightly hazy golden with ok white soapy head and lacing. aroma/taste: barley, bread, light citrus, spices, straw, grass, brown sugar, light fruit, light funk and floral notes. palette: strong hoppy and yeasty aroma, average carbonation, medium body, slightly above average sweetness, balanced by a medium bitterness, average to long duration and a watery texture. Overall: Very nice Belgian

3.6
DaridoPL (340) - SPAIN - JUL 1, 2021
UPDATED: JUL 1, 2021 Cerveza de aromas agradables pero modestos. Color miel, amarillo medio, casi ámbar, opaca y con una fina de de espuma por encima. Correcto el sabor, sin ser una maravilla pero con personalidad. Tonos malteados, dulces, afrutados y dulzones como de miel. Bastante buena opción, sin ser la mejor.

3.1
SilkTork (7107) - Southampton, United Kingdom, Hampshire, ENGLAND - JUN 24, 2021
UPDATED: JUN 24, 2021 Jun 2021. Small brown bottle, unfiltered, a year out of date. Cardboardy. Malty. Chewy. Lack of life. The yeast has died. Rather disappointing. [2.2] Oct, 2005. Sweeter and fuller than the standard Hoegaarden. The extra strength works well. [3.2] Sept, 2004: One of the more appealing of the wheat beers. When compared with Chimay White I preferred the easy drinkability of this one. [3.1] April, 2003:This is my reward for spending a few hours working in the garden. Clean and refreshing with delicate citric fruit tints. A bit gassy, which makes it a tad too lively in the mouth, and can result in unpleasant belching. Slightly firmer mouthfeel than the standard Hoe, otherwise remarkably similar. [3.1]

3.2
charlie_waiper (13) - - JUN 7, 2021
UPDATED: JUN 7, 2021 Cremosa, correcta, pero retrogustos algo industriales. Amarga pero notas finales dulces. Bien pero... le faltan matices más elaborados.

3.6
AleGuru2 (416) - Houten, NETHERLANDS - MAY 9, 2021
UPDATED: MAY 9, 2021 Mooi helder goudgeel bier met een flinke witte schuimkraag. Geuren van geel fruit. Smaken zijn wat aards van de gist, licht alcoholisch.

3.2
mikthoegersen (2) - - MAR 24, 2021 does not count
UPDATED: MAY 9, 2021 Lidt kedelig i smagen, underligt bitter. Ingenlunde den bedste pale jeg har smagt


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page    1  2 3 4 » 110


A tick is a star rating
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5